Crypto Regulation in India: Why It's Legal to Hold But Taxed Like It Isn't

Legal, but not defined

Crypto is not illegal in India. You can buy it, hold it, and sell it without breaking any law written specifically for that purpose. But that sentence is doing more work than it looks like: “not illegal” is a different thing from “regulated,” and India has never gotten around to the second part. There’s no dedicated law that classifies crypto as a security, a commodity, or a currency, and no single regulator with clear primary authority over crypto markets the way the SEC does for securities in the US or MiCA does across the EU. (For that broader picture of how other regions handle this, see Crypto Regulation: Why What You Can Trade Depends on Where You Live; India is one of the sharpest examples of what happens when that kind of framework simply doesn’t exist yet.)

What has filled the gap is tax law. Since 2022, India’s tax code has treated crypto with a specificity and severity that its market regulation never has, which means the most concrete, binding rules an Indian trader actually has to follow are tax rules, not trading rules. That inversion is the core thing worth understanding before doing anything else here.

The RBI’s ban that wasn’t a ban, and the Supreme Court reversal

The clearest illustration of the uncertainty is a single episode: in April 2018, the RBI (Reserve Bank of India) issued a circular instructing banks and other regulated financial entities not to provide services to any individual or business dealing in virtual currencies. It wasn’t a law banning crypto itself (the RBI doesn’t have the power to outlaw an asset class by circular), but it had nearly the same practical effect. Exchanges couldn’t maintain bank accounts, couldn’t process rupee deposits or withdrawals through normal banking rails, and several shut down or relocated as a result. For roughly two years, Indian crypto businesses operated in a country where owning crypto was legal but banking a crypto business essentially wasn’t.

That ended in March 2020, when India’s Supreme Court struck the circular down, ruling it was disproportionate and unconstitutional given that the RBI had not demonstrated actual harm to regulated banks from servicing crypto businesses. Banking access was restored, exchanges came back, and Indian trading volumes grew substantially over the following two years. The episode is worth knowing not just as history: it’s a concrete demonstration that in India, crypto’s legal footing has been shaped as much by a central bank circular and a court reversal as by any purpose-built statute, and that the ground can shift with only indirect legal action rather than clear legislation either way.

The tax regime: unusually specific, unusually harsh

Where India’s rules get genuinely concrete is taxation, and it’s worth walking through the mechanics because they’re stricter than how India taxes most other capital gains.

Since April 2022, India taxes gains on what it defines as Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) (a category that covers cryptocurrencies and most tokens) at a flat 30% rate. A few features of this regime stand out:

• No expense deductions, other than the cost of acquiring the asset itself. Trading fees, transaction costs, and other expenses that would normally reduce a taxable gain elsewhere generally can’t be deducted here.
• No loss offsetting. A loss on one crypto asset cannot be used to reduce a taxable gain on a different crypto asset, let alone offset gains or income from anything else. Sell Bitcoin at a loss and Ethereum at a gain in the same year, and the Bitcoin loss does nothing to reduce the tax owed on the Ethereum gain: a materially harsher rule than how capital losses are typically treated in Indian tax law generally.
• The flat rate applies regardless of how long you held the asset. There’s no reduced long-term rate the way there often is for other capital assets in India.

On top of the 30% tax itself, a 1% TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) applies to most crypto transactions above a threshold, deducted automatically at the point of the transaction rather than left for the trader to calculate and pay later. It’s a withholding mechanism, not an additional tax on top of the 30%, but it creates real friction, since it deducts value on every qualifying transaction rather than just on net gains at the end of a tax year.

That friction had a predictable effect: a meaningful amount of Indian trading volume moved to offshore exchanges not registered in India, specifically to avoid the 1% TDS deduction on every transaction. That shift then produced its own regulatory response: India has pressured and, in some cases, pursued blocking non-compliant offshore exchange apps from Indian app stores, and has required exchanges serving Indian users to register with the FIU-IND (Financial Intelligence Unit – India) as a compliance condition. Several major international exchanges registered with FIU-IND specifically to keep serving Indian customers legally after this pressure began.

SEBI’s undefined, still-evolving role

SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India), the body that regulates securities markets the way the SEC does in the US, has been floated at various points as a possible future regulator for certain categories of crypto tokens, particularly ones that might resemble securities. Nothing formal has settled this. SEBI is not currently the primary crypto regulator in India, and no legislation has handed it that role outright. It’s worth watching, not treating as settled: if India moves toward a dedicated market-conduct framework, SEBI or some purpose-built body taking on part of that role is one of the more plausible paths, but it hasn’t happened yet.

What an Indian trader should actually check before trading

• Legal-to-hold does not mean tax-friendly. These are separate questions, and India is one of the clearest cases where the gap between them matters in practice, not just in theory.
• The 30% tax and 1% TDS regime applies based on your tax residency, not the exchange you use. If you’re an Indian tax resident, gains are taxable at 30% whether you traded on a domestic exchange or an offshore one with no Indian presence at all.
• Using an offshore exchange to avoid the 1% TDS does not exempt you from the 30% tax obligation. TDS is a withholding and collection mechanism; avoiding it by trading somewhere it isn’t deducted doesn’t change your underlying liability to report and pay tax on the gain itself: it just means nothing was withheld in advance, and you still owe it.
• No loss offsetting means portfolio-level thinking about tax is limited. A diversified crypto portfolio doesn’t get the tax benefit of netting winners against losers the way it might with other asset classes in India.
• Confirm an exchange’s FIU-IND registration status if that matters to you: it’s become a practical signal of which offshore platforms are operating with Indian regulatory acknowledgment versus which aren’t.

This overlaps heavily with general tax principles that apply everywhere: for the broader logic behind why tax obligations and legal status are separate questions in every jurisdiction, not just India’s, see Crypto Taxes: What Usually Counts as a Taxable Event. India is simply one of the more concrete, codified examples of that general principle in action. For a broader directory of who regulates crypto where, see the crypto regulators directory.

Frequently asked questions

Is buying and holding crypto illegal in India? No. There is no law making it illegal to buy, hold, or sell crypto in India. What’s missing is a dedicated positive framework classifying it as a specific kind of regulated asset: the legal space it occupies is closer to undefined than either “banned” or “formally licensed.”

Does trading on an international exchange instead of an Indian one avoid the 30% tax? No. The 30% tax on Virtual Digital Asset gains applies based on your tax residency in India, not on where the exchange is based or registered. Using an offshore platform may avoid the 1% TDS being deducted automatically at the point of transaction, but it does not remove your underlying obligation to report and pay the 30% tax on any gain as an Indian tax resident.

Can I offset a crypto loss against a crypto gain to reduce my tax bill? Generally no, even if both are Virtual Digital Assets. Indian tax rules on VDAs specifically disallow offsetting a loss on one crypto asset against a gain on another, which is stricter than how losses are typically treated for other capital assets in India.

Is SEBI now the main crypto regulator in India? Not currently. SEBI has been discussed as a possible future regulator for certain token categories, but no legislation has formally assigned it that role, and India still lacks a single primary crypto market regulator.

Risk