Compare
BG Bitget VS OKX
Both exchanges offer Spot, Perpetual futures, Copy trading. The differences below come from our individual reviews of Bitget and OKX.
| Bitget | OKX | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Regions | Widely available internationally; not available to US, Canadian, Singaporean, Hong Kong, South Korean, or Netherlands residents, among other restricted jurisdictions: verify local availability before signing up. | Widely available; restricted or unavailable in some jurisdictions including the US for derivatives products: verify local availability before signing up. |
| Products | Spot, Margin, Perpetual futures, Copy trading, Launchpool / staking | Spot, Perpetual futures, Options, Copy trading, Bots |
| Maker fee | Verify current tier: Bitget uses a volume-based maker/taker schedule | Verify current tier: OKX uses a volume-based maker/taker schedule |
| Taker fee | Verify current tier: Bitget uses a volume-based maker/taker schedule | Verify current tier: OKX uses a volume-based maker/taker schedule |
Bitget pros
- Copy trading is a genuinely core, well-built product rather than a bolted-on feature, with both spot and futures copy modes
- Self-funded protection fund (reported at over $300 million) with public, trackable wallet addresses
- Monthly Merkle-tree proof-of-reserves reports with an independent, open-source verification tool
- Broad product suite (spot, margin, futures, copy trading, launchpad, a separate Web3 wallet) inside one ecosystem
OKX pros
- One of the few exchanges offering deep futures, options, and copy trading in a single product
- Broad asset and derivatives coverage in one interface
- Established copy-trading and bot tooling alongside manual trading
This table is generated from the same data behind our individual exchange reviews. See methodology for how it's put together. Fee figures marked "not yet verified" need confirming against live terms before this page is treated as launch-ready.