This space is available Advertise with CryptoOverlook → 160 × 600
This space is available Advertise with CryptoOverlook → 160 × 600
This space is available Advertise with CryptoOverlook → 728 × 90

Compare

Bitpanda VS Deribit

These two exchanges don't share an obvious product overlap. Differences below come from our individual reviews of Bitpanda and Deribit.

Bitpanda Deribit
Founded 2014 2016
Regions Available across the European Economic Area under EU passporting from its Austrian licenses; not built for or targeted at US customers, and unavailable in a number of non-EU markets. Not available to US persons directly; as of September 2026, eligible US users can reach Deribit's order books through Coinbase Financial Markets as a regulated intermediary. Broadly available elsewhere, subject to Deribit's own jurisdictional restrictions.
Products Spot Options, Perpetual futures, Dated futures, Combo/spread orders
Maker fee Not yet verified Not yet verified
Taker fee Not yet verified Not yet verified

Bitpanda pros

  • One account covers crypto, stocks, ETFs, and precious metals, a genuinely different positioning than a crypto-only exchange
  • Multiple MiCA licenses issued directly by Austria's FMA, plus prior approvals in Germany and Malta
  • Broad, mainstream fiat rail support (SEPA, cards, Apple Pay, PayPal) with fee-free deposits over a low minimum
  • Large, long-running user base (7.4 million registered users as of the end of 2025) with over a decade of operating history

Deribit pros

  • The dominant global crypto options venue by a wide margin, holding roughly half of all Bitcoin and Ethereum options volume and an even larger share of Bitcoin options specifically
  • Purpose-built options infrastructure (combo orders, a full volatility surface, portfolio margining) that generalist exchanges bolting on an options tab don't match
  • Backed by Coinbase's balance sheet and compliance infrastructure since the August 2025 acquisition, addressing a long-standing question about counterparty durability at a derivatives-only exchange
  • Keeps roughly 99% of user funds in cold storage with third-party custody (Fireblocks, Cobo) for the operational portion, and covered a 2022 hot-wallet loss entirely from company reserves rather than user funds

This table is generated from the same data behind our individual exchange reviews. See methodology for how it's put together. Fee figures marked "not yet verified" need confirming against live terms before this page is treated as launch-ready.

This space is available Advertise with CryptoOverlook → 728 × 90