Compare
BY Bybit VS CC Crypto.com
Both exchanges offer Spot, Perpetual futures, Options. The differences below come from our individual reviews of Bybit and Crypto.com.
| Bybit | Crypto.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Regions | Widely available; restricted or unavailable in some jurisdictions including the US for derivatives products: verify local availability before signing up. | The consumer app is available in most regions; the separate Crypto.com Exchange, margin, and derivatives products vary by jurisdiction and are more limited for US users specifically. Verify local availability before signing up. |
| Products | Spot, Perpetual futures, Options, Copy trading | Spot, Margin, Perpetual futures, Options |
| Maker fee | Verify current tier: Bybit uses a volume-based maker/taker schedule | Verify current tier: Crypto.com uses a volume-based maker/taker schedule that starts noticeably higher than several competitors at the base tier |
| Taker fee | Verify current tier: Bybit uses a volume-based maker/taker schedule | Verify current tier: Crypto.com uses a volume-based maker/taker schedule that starts noticeably higher than several competitors at the base tier |
Bybit pros
- Deep futures liquidity, especially on major pairs
- Mature, well-documented copy-trading product
- Fast account setup for spot and futures
Crypto.com pros
- Broad, genuinely useful product range beyond trading: a widely used crypto debit card, staking, and an in-house DeFi wallet
- Strong, growing regulatory footprint, including in-principle MiCA approval in the EU and a CFTC derivatives license in the US
- Large asset selection and a polished, beginner-friendly mobile app
This table is generated from the same data behind our individual exchange reviews. See methodology for how it's put together. Fee figures marked "not yet verified" need confirming against live terms before this page is treated as launch-ready.